Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Thoughts after Thanksgiving

“The living get to decide when the dead are gone” — from an article by EJ Montini in the AZ Republic. I guess that explains why my brother, Dick, and my grade-school friend, David, are still with me.

Two other grade-school friends both shared their reluctance to remove David’s name from their email address book, and I told them both that I couldn’t do it either — not yet. I also have my brother’s phone number in my PDA and my cellphone. Do I expect to contact Dick by phone? Do I expect to reach David by email? Of course not, but erasing their contact info is like erasing part of their memory. It is NOT part of them or part of their memory, but it FEELS like I would be erasing THEM if I hit the delete button. I’ll do it eventually, and it won’t really reduce my memory of them, but it will be that one more step to acknowledging that they are gone, and I’m not in a hurry to do that.

Sweet David

Such a cutie!

David Ralph Morton

E-mail Visit Guest Book

Morton, David Ralph
David Morton, 66, of Phoenix, Arizona passed away on November 10, 2009. David fought a brave and solitary battle with cancer and is finally at peace. He leaves many lifelong friends and his family – brothers Art and John, and sister Ann Morton. We will all miss his unique humor, his intellect, his fervent interest in issues of the day and his kind and giving nature. David, we love you and will always keep you in our hearts. We ask that any acknowledge ments of David’s life take the form of donations to Hospice of the Valley, 1510 E. Flower Street, Phoenix, 85014 who offered him comfort and safe passage in his final days with us.

 

Published in The Arizona Republic on November 15, 2009

Peter, Paul, & Mary were the first musical group that I ever saw in concert. I was in college and they came to perform right on campus. I already loved their music, but when I watched them sing, talk, and joke in concert, I learned the difference between singers and performers. I also fell in love with them, and have continued that love for over 47 years.

I visited the Peter Paul and Mary website just a few weeks ago to see if there was any update on her condition, and didn’t find any new tours listed. It worried me some, but didn’t stick with me long.  When I visited CNN’s homepage this morning, I was shocked to see that Mary had died.

Entertainment Weekly wrote the following

“…Peter, Paul and Mary played a crucial role in helping the folk-music scene become a mass popular movement in the early 1960s. They couldn’t have done it without Mary Travers’ clear, expressive vocals. A gifted interpreter of others’ songs, she was the principal reason why the trio’s covers of Pete Seeger’s “If I Had A Hammer” and Bob Dylan’s “Blowing in the Wind” were arguably better-loved than the originals. Harmonizing on silly kid’s tunes like the classic “Puff the Magic Dragon” one minute, playing for social justice at the historic March on Washington another — both in the year 1963 — Travers, along with bandmates Peter Yarrow and Noel Paul Stookey, epitomized something about that transformative era…”

Even better are some of the album liner notes from their first album -
…there seems to be something optimistic, something encouraging about this whole musical experience. Peter, Paul and Mary’s first album is bright with enthusiasm. No gimmicks. There is just something GOOD about it all. Good in the sense of Virtue, that is. And the news that something this GOOD can be as popular as this is can fill you with a new kind of optimism. Maybe everything’s going to be all right. Maybe mediocrity has had it. Maybe hysteria is on the way out. One thing for sure in any case: Honesty is back. Tell your neighbor.”

I think Mary lived long enough to see some progress made (how many roads must a man walk down before they call him a man? ) with the election of Barack Obama and the generally harmonious intermingling of people of color at work and play. There’s still mediocrity, there’s still hysteria — lot’s of it, but optimism has made its way back also. Mary and Peter and Paul always inspired me to do better although I wasn’t as brave as they. It was easier to just listen to them passionately sing the words, and believe that the words would make things better. Her voice especially made things better for me – I replayed her parts of “Hurry, Sundown” hundreds of times  (listen to youtube video below) where she sang beautifully and passionately

“Hurry down, sundown, get thee be gone,
Get lost in the sunrise, of a new dawn.
Hurry down, sundown, take the old day,
Wrap it in new dreams, send it my way!
Send it my way!
Send it my way!

I always liked the idea of the old tired day being wrapped in new dreams and sent my way the next morning — that is what Hope is all about…

The music industry remembers Mary Travers

I’ve seen this a couple of times, and have no idea how to explain his behavior other than to say it is planned. That in itself is fascinating, as are the thoughts that you can allow to run through your mind as you wonder why he does it.

Ever meet someone who is easy to be with right away? You laugh at the same things, enjoy the same things and treasure the same things?

I’ve always thought that everybody deserved medical care. Kids develop a sense of fair-play at an early age, and I’ve always based a lot of my values on what’s fair for everybody. Medical care can often mean the difference between life and death, so that placed it very high on the list of “must-haves” for people.

When I first started working full-time, I remember meeting a nurse and finding that she did NOT have sick leave. I found the irony of a healthcare worker not being provided paid time off for illness/injury to be both bizarre and unsettling — I was learning that the world was not fair. I knew that already, of course, but I just kept finding new ways that lack of fairness would surprise me.

Lots of people would tell me that I’m wrong to even want fair-play for everyone because people should only get what they DESERVE and many people don’t deserve medical care because they haven’t worked hard enough for it. Others would explain that medical care costs money and has to be paid for by someone and if it is provided to people who don’t have the money to pay for  it, then the money has to come from other people — and it would be UNFAIR to make someone pay for something that is given to someone else. Well, that does sound unfair, doesn’t it — to make someone pay for something they don’t want to pay for because they’re not going to get any benefit from it?

The first time I ever heard about people being mad about paying for someone else’s medical bills, I was surprised and kind of embarrassed that I would make someone mad. I never like to make people mad — it always upset me as a kid to do something that would make my mom or dad mad, and I tried hard to keep it from happening. So I pulled back for a moment (or longer); but then I thought How could anyone NOT want to help someone who needs medical care? Why would anyone NOT want to help someone who needs medical care?

Isn’t it simply a human instinct (not only human, but we’re dealing with humans right now) to help someone in need? If someone has their arms loaded with packages when they walk up to a door, don’t people open the door for them? When a person slips and falls, don’t people help them up? When a kid is crying because they are lost, doesn’t everyone try to help them find their mommy and daddy? Isn’t that the FIRST reaction to a person in need – what can I do to help?

I still believe that most people feel the instinctive desire to help anyone in trouble, but many folks have learned that they need to think about the consequences FIRST, instead of simply reacting with assistance. I’ve learned to do this also. I receive the mailings from the March of Dimes, the Disabled American Vets, the animal rescue groups, the foundations that raise money to fight cancer, heart disease, drug abuse… the list of people who need MY help can get very long, and doesn’t even include the people waiting in the ER because they don’t have health insurance and don’t have a doctor of their own.

Most people have someone they are responsible for – most people are parents and spouses and have promised to care for their kids and spouse “in sickness and in health”. They come first, and it’s only fair to decide to help others only when it doesn’t take away from your own family. So charity comes after paying for the family necessities – rent/mortgage, food, clothes, medical, utilities, ummm, well, gotta add the cell phone, the cable TV, the internet connection  – at home and on each of the cellphones, and food has to include eating out and clothes has to include the right names on the label, and food has to include fine wine, organic veggies, prime meats, and … there’s not really anything left overr for taxes (grrr!) let alone charity.

Okay, maybe we can cut the list of “necessities” down a bit, and then just deal with whether we need/want to pay for someone else’s visit to the doctor/hospital.

Does it make a difference WHO needs medical care? A smoker needs medical care after a heart attack (caused in part by smoking?); an obese woman needs care due to diabetes (caused in part by her diet?). There could be a long list of types of problems that might be brought on or exacerbated by a human’s bad habit – too little or too much exercise, overuse of drugs (prescription or not), failure to go to the doctor when they first felt ill, not holding down a job to earn health insurance, etc. …

Does certain behavior mean you no longer (or never did) deserve medical care?

What is the real question we should MUST ask?

Does this person deserve to suffer or die?

Do you deserve to suffer or die?

There have been a lot of angry people shown on the news lately talking about healthcare reform, and a lot of them say they are against the planned reforms. Some of them say a lot worse than that — “Obamacare is evil” or other words to show that they don’t just disagree with the proposals, but hate the intent behind the proposals.

Am I the only one who remembers how mad so many people were just a short time ago about what the health insurance companies were doing to them, or their family member, or their neighbor or friend or that little kid on the news last night?

Whatever happened to all those angry people who were trying to find donations for operations or medicine that their insurance wouldn’t pay for?

I think they are still around.

I did internet searches for health insurance companies, and then I did searches for “… sucks” websites – those websites devoted to gathering stories about all the bad things that a particular company does. Most successful businesses have at least one because, let’s face it, no one is perfect and the internet lets people share their complaints with little fear of reprisal. So, health insurance companies should be allowed their share of “… sucks” websites without thinking anything is really wrong with them or their services, right?

Results 1 – 10 of about 466,000 for cigna sucks. (0.46 seconds)
Results 1 – 10 of about 248,000 for blue cross sucks. (0.35 seconds)
Results 1 – 10 of about 35,700 for aetna sucks. (0.38 seconds)
Results 1 – 10 of about 53,900 for humana sucks. (0.34 seconds)

Whoa!

Does that seem like just a little bit more a LOT MORE than “their share”?!!

Like maybe a lot of people think there’s a PROBLEM with their insurance?

I wasn’t sure how many companies I should do a search for, so I tried a general category search and got this:

Results 110 of about 867,000 for health insurance sucks

Jumping Jehoshaphat,  we have a lot of reading to do…

Op-Ed Contributor to the New York Times

Why We Need Health Care Reform

By BARACK OBAMA
Published: August 15, 2009

OUR nation is now engaged in a great debate about the future of health care in America. And over the past few weeks, much of the media attention has been focused on the loudest voices. What we haven’t heard are the voices of the millions upon millions of Americans who quietly struggle every day with a system that often works better for the health-insurance companies than it does for them.

These are people like Lori Hitchcock, whom I met in New Hampshire last week. Lori is currently self-employed and trying to start a business, but because she has hepatitis C, she cannot find an insurance company that will cover her. Another woman testified that an insurance company would not cover illnesses related to her internal organs because of an accident she had when she was 5 years old. A man lost his health coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because the insurance company discovered that he had gallstones, which he hadn’t known about when he applied for his policy. Because his treatment was delayed, he died.

I hear more and more stories like these every single day, and it is why we are acting so urgently to pass health-insurance reform this year. I don’t have to explain to the nearly 46 million Americans who don’t have health insurance how important this is. But it’s just as important for Americans who do have health insurance.

There are four main ways the reform we’re proposing will provide more stability and security to every American.

First, if you don’t have health insurance, you will have a choice of high-quality, affordable coverage for yourself and your family — coverage that will stay with you whether you move, change your job or lose your job.

Second, reform will finally bring skyrocketing health care costs under control, which will mean real savings for families, businesses and our government. We’ll cut hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and inefficiency in federal health programs like Medicare and Medicaid and in unwarranted subsidies to insurance companies that do nothing to improve care and everything to improve their profits.

Third, by making Medicare more efficient, we’ll be able to ensure that more tax dollars go directly to caring for seniors instead of enriching insurance companies. This will not only help provide today’s seniors with the benefits they’ve been promised; it will also ensure the long-term health of Medicare for tomorrow’s seniors. And our reforms will also reduce the amount our seniors pay for their prescription drugs.

Lastly, reform will provide every American with some basic consumer protections that will finally hold insurance companies accountable. A 2007 national survey actually shows that insurance companies discriminated against more than 12 million Americans in the previous three years because they had a pre-existing illness or condition. The companies either refused to cover the person, refused to cover a specific illness or condition or charged a higher premium.

We will put an end to these practices. Our reform will prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage because of your medical history. Nor will they be allowed to drop your coverage if you get sick. They will not be able to water down your coverage when you need it most. They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or in a lifetime. And we will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses. No one in America should go broke because they get sick.

Most important, we will require insurance companies to cover routine checkups, preventive care and screening tests like mammograms and colonoscopies. There’s no reason that we shouldn’t be catching diseases like breast cancer and prostate cancer on the front end. It makes sense, it saves lives and it can also save money.

This is what reform is about. If you don’t have health insurance, you will finally have quality, affordable options once we pass reform. If you have health insurance, we will make sure that no insurance company or government bureaucrat gets between you and the care you need. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan. You will not be waiting in any lines. This is not about putting the government in charge of your health insurance. I don’t believe anyone should be in charge of your health care decisions but you and your doctor — not government bureaucrats, not insurance companies.

The long and vigorous debate about health care that’s been taking place over the past few months is a good thing. It’s what America’s all about.

But let’s make sure that we talk with one another, and not over one another. We are bound to disagree, but let’s disagree over issues that are real, and not wild misrepresentations that bear no resemblance to anything that anyone has actually proposed. This is a complicated and critical issue, and it deserves a serious debate.

Despite what we’ve seen on television, I believe that serious debate is taking place at kitchen tables all across America. In the past few years, I’ve received countless letters and questions about health care. Some people are in favor of reform, and others have concerns. But almost everyone understands that something must be done. Almost everyone knows that we must start holding insurance companies accountable and give Americans a greater sense of stability and security when it comes to their health care.

I am confident that when all is said and done, we can forge the consensus we need to achieve this goal. We are already closer to achieving health-insurance reform than we have ever been. We have the American Nurses Association and the American Medical Association on board, because our nation’s nurses and doctors know firsthand how badly we need reform. We have broad agreement in Congress on about 80 percent of what we’re trying to do. And we have an agreement from the drug companies to make prescription drugs more affordable for seniors. The AARP supports this policy, and agrees with us that reform must happen this year.

In the coming weeks, the cynics and the naysayers will continue to exploit fear and concerns for political gain. But for all the scare tactics out there, what’s truly scary — truly risky — is the prospect of doing nothing. If we maintain the status quo, we will continue to see 14,000 Americans lose their health insurance every day. Premiums will continue to skyrocket. Our deficit will continue to grow. And insurance companies will continue to profit by discriminating against sick people.

That is not a future I want for my children, or for yours. And that is not a future I want for the United States of America.

In the end, this isn’t about politics. This is about people’s lives and livelihoods. This is about people’s businesses. This is about America’s future, and whether we will be able to look back years from now and say that this was the moment when we made the changes we needed, and gave our children a better life. I believe we can, and I believe we will.

Barack Obama is the president of the United States.

Published: 7:00AM BST 30 Jul 2009

Casper: Pet cat catches the daily bus for four years

Casper: He has been making the journey for so long that all First Bus drivers have now been told to look out for him to ensure he gets off at the right stop. Photo: PA

Casper, which is 12 years old, boards the No3 service at 10.55am from outside his home in Plymouth, Devon, UK,  and travels the entire 11-mile route before returning home about an hour later.
On the route, the cat passes an historic dockyard and naval base, a city centre, several suburbs and the city’s red light district.
He has been making the journey for so long that all First Bus drivers have now been told to look out for him to ensure he gets off at the right stop.
Susan Finden, 65, a care worker who is Casper’s owner, said: “Casper has always disappeared for hours at a time but I never understood where he was going.
“I called him Casper because he had a habit of vanishing like a ghost. But then some of the drivers told me he had been catching the bus.
“I couldn’t believe it at first, but it explains a lot. He loves people and we have a bus stop right outside our house so that must be how he got started – just following everyone on.
“I used to catch the odd bus too so maybe he saw me and got curious what I was doing.
“Casper is quite quick for his age so he just hops on to the bus before the doors close. He catches the 10.55am service and likes to sit on the back seat.”
Rob Stonehouse, one of the drivers on the route, said: “He usually just curls up at the back of the bus. Sometimes he nips between people’s legs but he never causes any trouble.”
Casper has travelled an estimated 20,000 miles but Mrs Finden says because he is getting old the drivers often have to shuffle him off at the right stop.
A spokeswoman for First Bus said the firm has put a notice up in the office asking them to look after the non-paying passenger.

Do deer eat cats?

Older Posts »